Sikandar Ka Muqaddar: A Netflix-Worthy Thriller Bolstered by Jimmy Shergill’s Stellar Act
Neeraj Pandey, the filmmaker behind gripping thrillers like Special 26 (2013) and Baby (2015), ventures into familiar territory with Sikandar Ka Muqaddar. Starring Avinash Tiwary, Tamannaah Bhatia, and Jimmy Shergill, the film begins with promise, weaving a tale of suspense, betrayal, and redemption. However, while it holds potential for an engaging OTT watch, it falls short of delivering the cinematic thrill expected on the big screen.
The story of Sikandar Ka Muqaddar revolves around a diamond heist at a high-profile exhibition. Sikandar (Avinash Tiwary), his wife Kamini (Tamannaah Bhatia), and Mangesh Desai (Rajeev Mehta) find themselves as prime suspects under the watchful eye of Jaswinder Singh (Jimmy Shergill). Despite no concrete evidence against him, Sikandar’s life spirals into chaos—he loses his job, his reputation, and even his peace of mind. Seeking solace, he marries Kamini, a single mother, only for life to deal him another blow when Kamini falls seriously ill. Fifteen years later, a call from Jaswinder reopens the case, leading to a climax that ties up the loose ends.
While the film Sikandar Ka Muqaddar starts with Pandey’s signature knack for intrigue, the narrative falters midway. The shift from a taut heist thriller to a slow-moving personal drama feels jarring. As the focus shifts to Sikandar’s struggles, the film loses the pacing that initially gripped audiences. The addition of a romantic song further disrupts the flow, making the film feel unnecessarily stretched.
Despite its flaws, Sikandar Ka Muqaddar is elevated by its performances, particularly Jimmy Shergill’s. As the determined cop Jaswinder Singh, Shergill commands attention with his understated yet powerful portrayal. His nuanced performance brings depth to the character, making him the standout in an otherwise uneven narrative. Avinash Tiwary delivers a convincing performance as the troubled protagonist, while Tamannaah Bhatia adds warmth to the story, albeit in a role that could have been better fleshed out.
Ultimately, Sikandar Ka Muqaddar feels more suited for Netflix than theaters. Its character-driven narrative and emotional undertones resonate better on a smaller screen, where viewers can appreciate the story’s intricacies without the pressure of theatrical expectations. While it lacks the punch needed for a memorable big-screen experience, it remains a decent watch for fans of Pandey’s storytelling style.
Keyword: Sikandar Ka Muqaddar, Sikandar Ka Muqaddar review, Sikandar Ka Muqaddar Netflix drama
Stay tuned to Bollywood Pollywood Lifez for more updates
Film producer Krishan Kumar and actor Tanya Singh faced a devastating tragedy earlier this year when their 20-year-old daughter, Tishaa, passed away. Initially reported as a cancer-related death, Tanya Singh has now revealed that Tishaa was a victim of medical malpractice and misdiagnosis, sparking widespread outrage.
In a heartfelt Instagram post, Tanya broke her silence, sharing a video of precious moments with her daughter. She disclosed that Tishaa never had cancer but suffered due to a misdiagnosed autoimmune condition, which she believes was triggered by a vaccine given at 15. Tanya stated, “We were sucked into the medical trap much before all this information found us.” She urged parents to seek multiple medical opinions before subjecting their children to invasive tests like biopsies.
Click here to continue reading.
Also Read: Shah Rukh Khan Becomes India’s Top Taxpayer of 2023-24 with ₹92 Crore
Shah Rukh Khan has proved once again why he is called the King of Bollywood. According to Fortune India’s list of highest tax-paying celebrities for 2023-24, Shah Rukh Khan topped the chart by paying an impressive ₹92 crore in taxes. This makes him the biggest contributor among Indian celebrities, thanks to a blockbuster year at the box office.
2023 was a dream year for Shah Rukh Khan He made a grand comeback with Pathaan in January, which earned over ₹1000 crore worldwide. This was followed by the massive success of Jawan, which crossed ₹1150 crore globally, making it one of the highest-grossing films in Indian cinema. His third release of the year, Dunki, may not have been as big as the others but still managed to collect ₹400 crore.
Click here to continue reading.
Also Read: Aishwarya Rai Drops ‘Bachchan’ at Dubai Event: Separation Rumors Resurface Amid Viral Speech
Bollywood icon Aishwarya Rai sparked fresh speculation about her personal life during her recent appearance at the Global Women’s Forum in Dubai, UAE. While her empowering speech on women’s rights and equality gained global applause, it was her introduction at the event that became the talk of the town. Aishwarya was presented solely as Aishwarya Rai, with no mention of the Bachchan surname in the official graphics or announcements.
The viral screengrab of the stage backdrop showing her name as “Aishwarya Rai” has set tongues wagging, especially amid persistent rumors of a rift between Aishwarya and her husband, Abhishek Bachchan. Fans and media have been quick to connect the dots, questioning whether this omission was a deliberate choice or a mere oversight.
Click here to continue reading.
Also Read: Jacqueline Fernandez Claims Innocence in ₹200 Crore Money Laundering Case
Bollywood actress Jacqueline Fernandez has strongly denied allegations of money laundering in connection with the ₹200 crore extortion case involving conman Sukesh Chandrashekhar. Appearing before the Delhi High Court, her counsel argued that Jacqueline had no knowledge of the criminal origins of the extravagant gifts she received, including luxury items, from Sukesh. The next hearing is scheduled for December 3, when the Enforcement Directorate (ED) will present its submissions.
Senior Advocate Siddharth Agarwal, accompanied by Advocates Prashant Patil and Shakti Pandey, defended Jacqueline, asserting that she did not derive any economic benefit from criminal activities. They emphasized that Jacqueline was unaware of Sukesh’s extortion of ₹200 crore from Aditi Singh, the wife of a jailed industrialist, until the FIR was filed. Her team argued that “knowledge” is a key factor in proving involvement under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).